Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Goldstein
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered by the court in an action of assumpsit tried by the court without a jury and finding in favor of plaintiff by Jones, J. in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County in the sum of $91.23. A motion by defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto was filed but overruled by the court.
At the trial a statement of the principal facts was made by counsel for the plaintiff and agreed to by counsel for the defendant.
The admitted statement of facts shows that the plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Kunkel v. WherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Lineaweaver's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Paterson Parchment Paper Co. v. International Brotherhood of Paper MakersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Hanrahan v. Audubon Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Holt's Cigar Co. v. 222 Liberty AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- City of Philadelphia v. Nationwide InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Rudy v. McCloskey & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.