Legal Opinion

Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Goldstein

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 22, 1941No. Appeal, 314PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered by the court in an action of assumpsit tried by the court without a jury and finding in favor of plaintiff by Jones, J. in the Municipal Court of Philadelphia County in the sum of $91.23. A motion by defendant for judgment non obstante veredicto was filed but overruled by the court.

At the trial a statement of the principal facts was made by counsel for the plaintiff and agreed to by counsel for the defendant.

The admitted statement of facts shows that the plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Keck v. BieberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  2. March v. AllaboughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  3. Kunkel v. WherrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Wright v. Bristol Patent Leather Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Lineaweaver's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Paterson Parchment Paper Co. v. International Brotherhood of Paper MakersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. Hanrahan v. Audubon Builders, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Holt's Cigar Co. v. 222 Liberty AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Nationwide InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Rudy v. McCloskey & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API