Legal Opinion

Tashakori v. Lakis

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 21, 2011No. B220875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WILLHITE, J.

INTRODUCTION

Ali and Mahnaz Tashakori purchased a property with a house on it as well as an adjoining empty lot where they intended to build another home. In 2006 they sold the property with the existing home on it, while retaining the undeveloped lot. At that time, they learned that there was no recorded easement access to the empty lot, rendering it landlocked. They brought suit seeking to establish their right to ingress and egress over a small strip of land with a driveway owned by their neighbors, John and Mary Lakis. After a bench trial, the trial court granted the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Boeken v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nellie Gail Ranch Owners Ass'n v. McMullinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Shoen v. ZacariasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Hansen v. Sandridge Partners, L.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Ranch At the Falls LLC v. O'Neal, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Hinrichs v. MeltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API