Legal Opinion

McCauley v. Tropic of Cancer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1963PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The Statute.

This action was brought under sec. 269.S6S, Stats., entitled, “Declaratory judgments against obscene matter.” The issue is whether the matter complained of is obscene. The word “obscene” is not defined. The statute does provide that,

“. . . The dominant effect of the whole of such matter shall be determinative of whether said matter is obscene.” 1

The statute directs the court,

“. . . subject to the ordinary rules of evidence in civil actions [to] . . . receive the testimony of experts and evidence as to the literary, cultural or educational character of said matter and as to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Sunshine Book Co. v. SummerfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. One, Inc. v. OlesenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Times Film Corp. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re GianniniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Zeitlin v. ArneberghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. KnappWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. United States v. Irving Klaw and Jack KramerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. State v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API