Legal Opinion

State v. Knapp

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2005No. 2000AP2590-CRPublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 1. This case is on remand from the United States Supreme Court,1 which vacated our decision in State v. Knapp, 2003 WI 121, *89265 Wis. 2d 278, 666 N.W. 2d 881 (Knapp I). In Knapp I, this court concluded that physical evidence obtained as the direct result of a Miranda2 violation is inadmissible when the violation was an intentional attempt to prevent the suspect from exercising Fifth Amendment rights. Id., ¶ 78. In light of United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630, 124 S. Ct. 2620 (2004), in which a plurality of the Court concluded that the fruit of the poisonous tree…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. DuboseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. AriasWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. VondehnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. YoungWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API