Legal Opinion
STATE Ex Rel MACOMB COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. MESK
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1983No. Docket 57712PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C.J.
Plaintiff commenced this action on March 24, 1980, and alleged that the Art Studio located on Van Dyke Road in the City of Warren was a nuisance pursuant to MCL 600.3801; MSA 27A.3801, in that it was being used "for the purpose of assignation or prostitution, or, for the use of prostitutes”. After a bench trial which was commenced on December 16, 1980, the trial court entered an order enjoining defendants from operating the premises for those purposes and ordered the building closed for a period of one year. Defendants appeal as of right.
The Art Studio was a massage parlor operated by Art…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- MICHIGAN Ex Rel WAYNE COUNTY PROSECUTOR v. BENNISMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Thangavelu v. Department of Licensing & RegulationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- MICHIGAN EX REL WAYNE CTY. PROSECUTING ATTORNEY v. DuckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. ConnallyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.