Legal Opinion

Cox v. Hott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 31, 1977No. 439PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellants contend that the lower court erred when it granted appellee’s motion for judgment on the pleadings because the statute of limitations had run.

On July 3, 1971, the parties were involved in an automobile accident on Route 19, Township of Peters, Washington County. As a result of the collision, appellant William Cox’s 1967 Pontiac was damaged beyond repair and all of the appellants suffered injuries described in their complaint as “serious and severe.”

Appellants commenced an action in trespass by filing a praecipe for a writ of summons on June 25, 1973, within the two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Peterson v. Philadelphia Suburban Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Yefko v. OchsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Slezynger v. BischakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Warden v. ZanellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Fleehr v. MummertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Pannill v. SeahorneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Korman Commercial Properties, Inc. v. Furniture.com, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Sherry v. Trexler-Haines Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API