Legal Opinion

Pannill v. Seahorne

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1980No. 1578PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that appellees’ action in trespass is barred by the statute of limitations. We agree in part and, accordingly, reverse in part the order of the lower court denying appellant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

On April 17, 1974, the parties were involved in an automobile accident in the city of Pittsburgh. Subsequently, on April 15, 1976, ■ appellees (plaintiffs) • filed a complaint in trespass in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County in which they sought to recover from appellant (defendant) for personal injuries and property damage allegedly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Zarlinsky v. LaudenslagerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Salay v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Ehrhardt v. CostelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Beck v. MinestrellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Weiss v. EquibankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Schriver v. MazziottiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Cahill v. SchultsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Feher by Feher v. AltmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Robinson v. Trenton Dressed Poultry Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API