Legal Opinion

Crockett v. Gray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Douglas District Court. Action brought by B. Gray against Elizabeth I. Crockett and two others, to compel them to convey to him certain real estate. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the November term, 1886. The defendant Crockett brings the case here. The material facts are stated in Gray v. Crockett, 30 Kas. 138; Crockett v. Gray, 31 id. 346; Gray v. Crockett, 35 id. 66, 686; and in the opinion herein.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This is the fifth time that this case has been before this court for consideration. (Gray v. Crockett, 30 Kas. 138; Crockett v. Gray, 31 id. 346; Gray v. Crockett, 35 *660id. 66; Gray v. Crockett, 35 id. 686.) A preliminary question is raised. It is said there is not such a transcript filed as is required by the statute. The point is well taken; but upon the motion filed by the counsel for the defendant in error, and consented to by the opposing parties, the transcript in the case of Gray v. Crockett, 35 Kas. 66, is treated as a part of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Gray v. CrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  3. Gray v. CrockettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Davis v. ParkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MutchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Leafgreen v. Drake's Exrs.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. O'Connor v. Kearny JunctionNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Shelter Corp. of Canada Ltd. v. BozinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Chastain v. CrossfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API