Legal Opinion

Leafgreen v. Drake's Exrs.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1930No. Appeal, 182PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schafeee,

As a result of a decree of specific performance entered by the court below and affirmed by us (280 Pa. 215), defendants conveyed the property, subject of the litigation, to plaintiff. The decree required them to file an account of all transactions arising out of their possession, control and operation of the property since May 13, 1918, the date of the sale agreement which the decree enforced. When the account was stated, a number of exceptions were filed to it, which were passed upon by the chancellor, and from his order in connection therewith defendants…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Minard v. BeansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Head v. MeloneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Howell's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Sladkin Et Ux. v. Greene Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. In the Matter of Henry Kaufhold, Bankrupt. W. Louis Schlesinger, Trustee of the Estate of Henry Kaufhold, a Bankrupt and Forest R. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Boyd & Mahoney v. Chevron U.S.A. & Cumberland Farms, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Lewis v. LockhartAlaska Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API