Legal Opinion

Kaine v. Warden

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2000No. 99-2103PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Kaine claims that at the time the trial court revoked his probation, his two-year probationary period had expired and divested the trial court of jurisdiction. Under R.C. 2951.09, “[a]t the end or termination of the period of probation, the jurisdiction of the judge or magistrate to impose sentence ceases and the defendant shall be discharged.” And pursuant to the statute, “ ‘[i]t matters not that the alleged violation of probation occurred during the period of probation and could have resulted, if timely prosecuted, in a revocation of probation and imposition of sentence.’ ” State v. Jackson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. White v. JunkinOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hernandez v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BryantOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Hemsley v. Burnham UnruhOhio Supreme Court · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API