Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Haney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9401PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

This suit was commenced by the appellees against the appellants, in the White Circuit Court. The appellees were severally the owners and holders of certain municipal bonds, issued by the incorporated town of Montieello, and the appellants were the town of Montieello, James M. Gardner and others, trustees of the town, the school town of Montieello, William S. Bushnell, trustee of the school town, William R. Harvey, treasurer, and Benjamin Reynolds, marshal, of the town of Montieello. The object of the suit was to compel the appellants, by mandate, to levy a tax of fifty cents on each $100 of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Halstead v. Board of Comm'rsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Louisville & New Albany Railroad v. State ex rel. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Kane v. State ex rel. WoodsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Walpole v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Robinson v. SchenckIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Johnson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Schneck v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Anderson County Road District No. 8 v. PollardTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wren v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API