Legal Opinion

Anderson County Road District No. 8 v. Pollard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1927No. 4771PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cureton

This is a mandamus proceeding brought by Anderson County Road District No. 8, the County Judge and County Commissioners of Anderson County against the Attorney-General, for the purpose of requiring him to approve $500,000 of road bonds previously voted by the electors of the road district at an election held for the purpose. Anderson County Road District No. 8 was created by order of the Commissioners Court on the 13th of October, 1922, under authority of the Constitution and laws of the State, particularly Sec. 52, Art. 3, of the Constitution, Chap. 2, Title 18, Revised Statutes of 1911, as…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Stockdale v. Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Burch v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Pyote Independent School Dist. v. DyerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  5. Lyford Independent School Dist. v. Willamar Independent School Dist.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API