Legal Opinion
Roche v. Aetna, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 29, 2016No. Civil No. 13-3933 (NLH/KMW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, United States District Judge:
This suit concerns alleged violations of New Jersey’s insurance regulation laws brought by Plaintiff Michelle Roche (“Plaintiff’ or “Roche”) both individually and as a putative class representative against Defendants Aetna, Inc., Aetna Health, Inc., Aetna Health Insurance Co., and Aetna Life Insurance Co. (collectively, the “Aetna Defendants”) and The Rawl-ings Company, LLC (“Rawlings” and collectively with the Aetna Defendants, “Defendants”). Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Defendants’ Motion” or “Defs.’…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Zambelli Fireworks Manufacturing Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Michelle Roche, Individually and as Class Representative v. Aetna Inc., et al.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- ROCHE v. AETNA INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023