Roberts v. Erickson
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
After filing his appeal in forma pauperis, plaintiff Gary Roberts brought a motion before this court asking that the state pay for the expense of preparing the transcript of the trial in this matter. Roberts stated that he was indigent, had filed this appeal under an affidavit of impecuniosity, and required the transcript to present his appeal adequately: Roberts previously had filed a motion in the trial court asking the state to pay the expense. The trial court had ruled that the state’s obligation to pay for transcripts was restricted to criminal appeals and did not extend to civil…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Zamora v. DraperUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
4Cited by11 opinions
- Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Grand County v. Emery CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Bradley v. Hazard Technology Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Arndt v. First Interstate Bank of Utah N.A.Utah Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.