Legal Opinion

Katz v. New England Fuel Oil Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 6, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.

This case was here previously. In the decision at that time, plaintiffs’ appeal was dismissed, but without prejudice, *453for prematurity. Katz et al. v. New England Fuel Oil Company et al., 135 Me., 379, 197 A., 401.

The causéis now presented on a completed record, inclusive of the answer of the New England Fuel Oil Corporation, a Nevada incorporation, the acts of whose officers have allegedly operated adversely to the interests of the organization and its stockholders. Wells v. Dane, 101 Me., 67, 63 A., 324.

To authorize a corporation stockholder to sue in his own behalf, or, as here, for himself…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Trask v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  2. Hyams v. Old Dominion Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1915
  3. Bates Street Shirt Co. v. WaiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  4. Bar Harbor & Union River Power Co. v. Foundation Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  5. Masters v. Van WartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HoffaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
  2. Otis & Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Dumais v. DumaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
  4. Corbett v. NoelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  5. Irving Eliasberg, Inc. v. RooseveltSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API