Bar Harbor & Union River Power Co. v. Foundation Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
The trial judge reported this case, plaintiff and defendant consenting, for final decision by the full court. By the report, it is understood that the parties waive all matters of form and process, and desire this court to rule the law and decide the facts, on consideration of the legally admissible and relevant evidence. R. S., Chap. 82, Sec. 46; Pillsbury v. Brown, 82 Me., 450; Dansky v. Kotimaki, 125 Me., 72.
The suit is for the failure of a storage reservoir dam. The dam had been across the Union river, above Ellsworth. Primary inquiry is whether the facts give rise to action. If yes,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Eustace v. DickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barrett v. McDonald Investments, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- Monk v. MortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1943
- Shiro v. DrewDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1959
- Callahan v. Ganneston Park Development Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968
- Hills v. Gardiner Savings InstitutionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.