Masters v. Van Wart
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDeasy, J.
Procedure. The court below by its decree, appealed from, sustained a demurrer to the plaintiff's bill in equity and dismissed the bill.
In this State, contrary to the rule prevailing in some jurisdictions, (Whitehouse, Vol. 1, Page 850) an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory decree in an equity cause. R. S., Chap. 82, Sec. 24. But such appeal does “not suspend any proceedings . . . in the cause and shall not be taken to the Law Court until after final decree.” R. S., Chap. 82, Sec. 24.
A decree in equity overruling or sustaining a demurrer and doing nothing more, is interlocutory…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Thomas v. BealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Forbes v. TuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Alexander v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Strickland v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnsen v. American-Hawaiian S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Drew v. BowenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Haynes v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Enercon v. Global Computer Supplies, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2009
- Glenwood Farms, Inc. v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.