Legal Opinion
United States v. Ripinsky
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1997No. Nos. 94-50486, 94-50488PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Ripinsky and Kingston appeal from their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to commit bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371, bank fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1344, wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343, and money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1957, as well as the criminal forfeiture of certain assets and orders of restitution. The district court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction to review their convictions and sentences pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. The notices of appeal were filed after sentencing but before judgment had been entered. The…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Tenorio SablanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Thongsangoune SayakhomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John C. Whitehead, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Juvenile MaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.