Legal Opinion
United States v. Juvenile Male
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 8, 1997No. Nos. 96-10473, 96-10474, 96-10477PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Three juvenile defendants—R.B., N.P., and M.A.C. (collectively, “Defendants”)—appeal the district court’s orders transferring them for prosecution as adults on charges of conspiracy to participate in a racketeering enterprise, in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d).1 Defendants contend that the district court erred in concluding that the Government need only show that their acts had a “de minimis” effect on interstate commerce in order for the court to have jurisdiction in a RICO prosecution. In…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Justin Rone, United States of America v. Roy Dupont LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Lowell Musick and Sharlene Musick v. Gene Burke, Burke Vending and Catering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Keith Bernard Crenshaw, United States of America v. Kamil Hakeem Johnson, United States of America v. Timothy Kevin McGruderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.