Legal Opinion

Vorrath v. Garrelts

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1971No. Docket 10122PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

Plaintiff contractor agreed to construct a house according to plans submitted by defendant owner for the sum of $28,948.70. Numerous changes in the plans, all of which were suggested by the defendant, increased the total price by an *465additional $6,000. After requesting, but not receiving, the additional $6,000 for these plan changes the plaintiff ceased working on the defendant’s partially-completed house.

At trial level the plaintiff’s mechanic’s lien was upheld and foreclosed in the amount of $6,663.

Seeking to invalidate plaintiff’s lien the defendant argues that plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wallich Lumber Co. v. GoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Burman v. EwaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Lowrie & Webb Lumber Co. v. FergusonMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Grand River Lumber & Coal Co. v. GlennMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Halpin v. GarmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Norcross Co. v. Turner-Fisher AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Grand Ledge Mobile Home ParkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Spartan Asphalt Paving Co. v. Tri-Cities Construction, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Renshaw v. SamuelsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API