Legal Opinion

Herrington v. Flanders

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 17, 1902PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Evans. Emanuel superior court. April 26, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtPish, J.

1. Under the Penal Code, § 1079, it is manifestly unlawful to charge the accused in a criminal case, upon his conviction, with “ the costs of any witness of the State, unless such witness was subpoenaed, sworn, and examined on the trial.” The prohibition in that section against charging the accused, except as therein indicated, with the costs of “more than two witnesses to the same point” relates, of course, only to witnesses who have actually been “subpoenaed, sworn, and examined.”

2. Under the law above announced, the superior court erred in not sustaining the certiorari.

Judgment reversed.

All…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1915
  2. State v. . MeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API