Legal Opinion
State v. . Means
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 8, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was acquitted of the crime for which he was indicted.
The judge made the following order, omitting immaterial parts as to exceptions and case on appeal:
"It is hereby ordered that all of the State's witnesses called, sworn and examine in the trial of this case will be permitted to prove their attendance before the clerk (any not having done so being still granted that opportunity), and shall be paid for their attendance the regular fees of witnesses provided by the statute, and full mileage also as provided by the statute, nonresident witnesses being permitted to prove mileage…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. . MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Clerk's Office v. Commissioners of Carteret CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Patterson v. Ramsey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. ScogginSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. TindallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Jarrell v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.