Legal Opinion
Phillips v. Bartolomie
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 1975No. Civ. 32849PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
Plaintiffs, George and Frances Phillips, judgment debtors, appeal from a judgment of dismissal after the court sustained the demurrers of respondent Bartolomie, the Sheriff of Mendocino County, and respondent in intervention, Montgomery Ward & Company, the judgment creditor, to their second amended complaint on grounds of mootness and failure to state a class action. Although the parties on appeal initially confined their briefs to these issues, we have not found it necessary to reach the pleading issues in view of Raigoza v. Sperl (1973) 34 Cal.App.3d 560 [110 Cal.Rptr.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Imperial Bank v. Pim Electric, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Betts v. TomDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1977
- Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.