Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 1997, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Claimant owns and operates a seasonal ice cream business that is open every year from April to October and closed during the off-season. Substantial evidence supports the finding of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant was ineligible to receive benefits during the off-season because he was not totally unemployed. During the relevant time period, claimant wrote eight…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of GonyoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re the Claim of MonroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. In re the Claim of ValvanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BundschuhAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of GormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. In re the Claim of WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. In re the Claim of WachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API