Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Weinstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 29, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 15, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she was not totally unemployed.. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, the owner and teacher at a dance studio, was not totally unemployed at *657the time she was receiving unemployment insurance benefits and charging her with a recoverable overpayment and loss of benefit days. Although the dance studio was inactive during the summer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of De MariaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of PalmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of TykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SantoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of DeynekaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API