Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Peters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 1986No. 422A85PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

The questions presented on appeal are (1) whether in ruling on a motion for a new trial because of excessive or inadequate damages the trial court, if requested, must make findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (2) if so, whether the findings and conclusions of law made in this case are sufficient. We answer the questions “yes” and “no,” respectively, and affirm the Court of Appeals.

I

This is a civil action for damages for intentional assault and battery, arising from a 27 September 1979 incident in which defendant Peters walked up behind his co-worker, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Worthington v. BynumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Coggins v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Worthington v. BynumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Finch v. Covil Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
  4. Kremer v. Food Lion, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Lynn v. BurnetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API