Nobles v. First Carolina Communications, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WALKER, Judge.
Pursuant to N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 3(c)(2), the time period for filing and serving a notice of appeal is tolled by a timely motion under Rule 52(b). Insofar as the trial court failed to find that plaintiff’s motion to amend judgment pursuant to Rule 52(b) was untimely, plaintiff’s notice of appeal in the present case was appropriately given on 27 December 1990 after Judge Brown’s order denying plaintiff’s Rule 52(b) motion was entered on 27 November 1990. The motions of First Carolina and Kilpatrick & Cody to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal are therefore denied.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Inda v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Richardson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Harrison v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Blitz v. Agean, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Pitts v. American Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.