Legal Opinion
State v. Brahy
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 12, 1974No. 1 CA-CR 691PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OGG, Judge.
Appellant-defendant Christine Virginia Brahy challenges the constitutionality of A.R.S. § 13-371 as impinging upon her First Amendment rights; on this basis she seeks to set aside her conviction for disorderly conduct. The statute reads:
“Article 15. Disorderly Conduct
§ 13-371. Disturbing the peace; methods ; punishment
A. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor who maliciously and wilfully disturbs the peace or quiet of a neighborhood, family or person by:
1. Loud or unusual noise.
2. Tumultuous or offensive conduct.
*5253. Threatening, traducing, quarreling, challenging to fight or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McKay v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. StarskyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ed Knox, an Individual v. Southwest Airlines, a Texas Corporation, and David Swafford Robert Hopper City of Phoenix, a MunicipalityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
- In Re John M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- In Re Louise C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.