Legal Opinion

Ed Knox, an Individual v. Southwest Airlines, a Texas Corporation, and David Swafford Robert Hopper City of Phoenix, a Municipality

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 5, 1997No. 96-16976PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINS, Circuit Judge:

After a dispute at Phoenix’s Sky Harbor Airport, plaintiff Ed Knox was arrested by Phoenix police officers David Swafford and Robert Hopper on charges of trespassing and disorderly conduct. Knox sued Swaf-ford, Hopper, and the City of Phoenix for violating his civil rights. The officers bring this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. We hold that we have jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

We deal here with an incident that escalated into a regrettable…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Douglas W. Schwenk v. James Hartford Steve Sinclair Robert Mitchell,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Kennedy v. City of RidgefieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Jeffers v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API