Legal Opinion

In re Ambrusko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, as executor of the estate of decedent, instituted a discovery proceeding pursuant to sections 205 and *385206 of the Surrogate’s Court Act to compel the appellant insurance company to pay over the proceeds of two industrial insurance policies issued by it on the life of petitioner’s testate, which policies contained no designated beneficiary but contained the usual facility of payment clause. At the time of decedent’s death, the policies were in the possession of third persons who claimed an interest therein. The insurer and the third persons were made parties to the discovery…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  3. In Re the Accounting of EhlertNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BlackOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re the Estate of HilliardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  3. In re the Estate of RosenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of StiassniNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  5. In re the Estate of BalthazarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API