State v. Moody
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In his first three propositions of law appellant contends that it was reversible error for the trial court to admit in evidence certain inculpatory statements made by him to the police as well as other evidence elicited or obtained from him during his detention, since he was not provided his federal constitutional and state statutory (R. C. 2935.20) rights to counsel; that there was no voluntary waiver of the Miranda rights by the accused in this cause, since he was not permitted to make telephone calls after his detention by the police; and, irrespective of the fact that no pretrial motion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- State v. WadeOhio Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JellsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. ShindlerOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. MonfordOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.