Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Spink & Williamson Faculty Ass'n
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the application seeking a stay of arbitration and granted the cross application to compel arbitration. The collective bargaining agreement between petitioner and respondent Williamson Faculty Association defines a grievance as “a claim by a unit member that there has been a violation, misinterpretation, or inequitable application of any provision of this agreement.” Whether respondents are “unit members” is an issue for the arbitrator to determine (see, Matter of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Board of Education of Watertown City School District & Watertown Education Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- In re the Arbitration Between Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES, & Jefferson-Lewis-Hamilton-Herkimer-Oneida BOCES Professional Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between City of Ithaca & Ithaca Paid Fire Fighters Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re the Arbitration between Odessa-Montour Central School District & Odessa-Montour Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- DEROSA, PATRICIA v. DYSTER, PAULAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- DeRosa v. DysterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Arbitration between Village of Kenmore & Kenmore Club Police Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.