DeRosa v. Dyster
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Garni, J. (dissenting).
I respectfully disagree with the conclusions of my colleagues that there were no administrative remedies available to petitioner prior to commencing this CPLR article 78 proceeding and that she was not required to utilize the grievance procedure set forth in the collective bargaining *1473agreement (CBA) between respondent City of Niagara Falls (City) and the union representing petitioner (union). Inasmuch as petitioner did not exhaust her administrative remedies, I conclude that the petition should be dismissed in its entirety. Therefore, I dissent.
On September 30, 2009,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Crawford v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Plummer v. KlepakNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Ledain v. Town of OntarioNew York Supreme Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.