Legal Opinion

Browder v. Board of Com'rs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 12, 1934No. 3 Div. 97PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The appellant, alleging that he is a resident citizen and taxpayer of the city of Montgomery, filed the bill in this case against the board',pf commissioners of the-city of Montgomery and the individual commissioners, to restrain and enjoin them “from issuing, selling, ¡exchanging or delivering any of said refunding bonds proposed to be issued for the purpose of refunding” certain bonds issued by the town of Capitol Heights, and for gen-' eral relief. The city of Montgomery is not a party to the bill.

The bill alleges that said town of Capitol Heights, -on September 1, 1923,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Seals v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. City of Ensley v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  3. McDonald v. Mobile Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Sullivan v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Gillespie v. GibbsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Perry v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. GunterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Mountain Brook Estates, Inc. v. SolomonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  5. Benson v. Pickens CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API