Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Nicnick
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 12, 2007No. SC06-290PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
963 So.2d 219 (2007)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
David Samuel NICNICK, Respondent.
No. SC06-290.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 12, 2007.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and Kenneth Lawrence Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, and Juan Carlos Arias, Bar Counsel, The Florida Bar, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Complainant.
Kevin P. Tynan of Richardson and Tynan, PLC, Tamarac, FL, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report recommending that David Samuel Nicnick be found guilty of professional misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. MacMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- The Florida Bar v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- The Florida Bar v. CarlonSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Florida Bar v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Florida Bar v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Corey David Treas v. Chantal Elizabeth KoernerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2019
- The Florida Bar v. Danielle Renee WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2025
- The Florida Bar v. Derek Vashon JamesSupreme Court of Florida · 2021