Florida Bar v. Watson
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have for review a referee’s report recommending that William Bedford Watson, III, be found guilty of professional *917misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s findings of fact. For the reasons discussed herein, we disapprove the referee’s recommendation that Watson be found not guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-8.4(c). We find that Watson is guilty of three violations of the rule. We approve the referee’s recommendations that Watson be found guilty of four violations of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
- The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
- The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- The Florida Bar v. Miguel Fernando MirabalSupreme Court of Florida · 2024