Legal Opinion

Florida Bar v. Watson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 8, 2011No. SC09-2022PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review a referee’s report recommending that William Bedford Watson, III, be found guilty of professional *917misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for ninety days. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. We approve the referee’s findings of fact. For the reasons discussed herein, we disapprove the referee’s recommendation that Watson be found not guilty of violating Rule Regulating the Florida Bar 4-8.4(c). We find that Watson is guilty of three violations of the rule. We approve the referee’s recommendations that Watson be found guilty of four violations of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. TemmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  3. The Florida Bar v. ShoureasSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Florida Bar v. RotsteinSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
  5. The Florida Bar v. FredericksSupreme Court of Florida · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  3. The Florida Bar v. Jose Carlos MarreroSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. The Florida Bar v. Miguel Fernando MirabalSupreme Court of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API