Legal Opinion

State v. Kulick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 22, 2021No. A172826PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

680 Submitted May 21; conviction on Count 1 reversed, remanded for resentencing, otherwise affirmed September 22, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GREGORY MICHAEL KULICK, Defendant-Appellant. Yamhill County Circuit Court 19CR31633; A172826

497 P3d 789

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unlawful possession of meth- amphetamine, ORS 475.894 (Count 1). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA) on that count. The state responds that the court did not err, because a rational trier of fact could infer that defen- dant…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BoltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SerbinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. TaciaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. State v. ChanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  5. State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API