Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3281 ) ILLINOIS MINE SUBSIDENCE ) INSURANCE FUND, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: Now before the Court is Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Union Pacific”) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 65) and Defendant Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund’s (“the Fund”) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 75). For the reasons set forth, Union Pacific’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.