Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided December 22, 2025No. 3:20-cv-03281Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 20-cv-3281 ) ILLINOIS MINE SUBSIDENCE ) INSURANCE FUND, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, U.S. District Judge: Now before the Court is Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company’s (“Union Pacific”) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 65) and Defendant Illinois Mine Subsidence Insurance Fund’s (“the Fund”) Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e 75). For the reasons set forth, Union Pacific’s Motion for Summary Judgment (d/e…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API