Legal Opinion

Castro County, Texas v. Joe Crespin

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 6, 1996No. 95-5141, 95-5183PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

Appellant Crespin appeals from the decision of a three-judge District Court denying his “motion to reopen” to file for attorneys’ fees under the fee-shifting provision of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973i(e) (1994), pursuant to which fees are awarded to “the prevailing party.”

Appellant intervened on behalf of defendant United States in an action brought by Castro County under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973c (1994), to get preclearance of a redistricting plan. On April 13, 1994,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. St. Marks Place Housing Co. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. American Horse Protection Ass'n v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  4. Mobley v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  5. Southeastern Federal Power Customers, Inc. v. HarveyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API