Legal Opinion

St. Marks Place Housing Co. v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 25, 2010No. 09-5257PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

Circuit Judge HENDERSON concurs in the judgment. TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, the current owners and prospective buyers of an affordable housing complex, seek to prepay the project’s federally-insured mortgage. The Department of Housing and Urban Development interpreted the mortgage to require its approval for prepayment and then conditioned that approval on the parties agreeing to maintain the property as affordable housing. Appellants challenge this decision, contending that HUD regulations prohibit the Department from requiring…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Capitol Sprinkler Inspection, Inc. v. Guest Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. North American Butterfly Association v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  3. Crista Ramos v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. AVETISYANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012
  5. Limnia, Inc. v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API