Legal Opinion

United States v. Frank Jimenez-Dominguez, A.K.A. Ramon Santos, A.K.A. Frank Martin Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Dominquez Jimenez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 22, 2002No. 99-50760PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARMSTRONG, District Judge.

Frank Jimenez-Dominguez (“Jimenez”) appeals his conviction and sentence for a violation of 8 U.S.C. section 1326. Jimenez contends that his conviction should be reversed because the district court failed to inquire whether his guilty plea was the result of discussions between the United States and him or his attorney as required by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(d). 1 He also asserts that his sentence should be vacated under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because the trial court enhanced his sentence upon a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Jimenez Recio, United States of America v. Adrian Lopez-MezaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Victoriano Dejesus PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. Lucio Pina-Jaime, AKA Lucio Pina Jaime AKA Lucio Jaime PinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Jerome MancusoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Eliodoro ValensiaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API