Legal Opinion

Thomas Caldwell Mundy v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 17, 1982No. 80-7932PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this diversity case, Thomas Caldwell Mundy asserted six claims based on the alleged acts of supervisory employees of the defendant, Southern Bell Telephone & Tele graph Company (Southern Bell), which Mundy alleged caused him to resign his position with the defendant. 1 Based on the pleadings and the depositions of three principal witnesses, including Mundy, the district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment on all counts of the complaint. Mundy appeals the district court’s ruling only as to that count alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress under Florida…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kirksey v. JerniganSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. Lay v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. DeMarco v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Food Fair, Inc. v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Slocum v. Food Fair Stores of Florida, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Monarch Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Eddy v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Sheila Arbour, Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Arbour v. Eugene JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Dominguez v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Blong v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API