Legal Opinion
Health Plus of New Mexico, Inc. v. Harrell
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 18, 1998No. 17677PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} Insured party (Harrell) appeals the trial court’s determination that it has a contractual and legal duty to hold settlement funds for the insurer (Health Plus). Health Plus cross-appeals the trial court’s determination that its claim of subrogation against the City of Albuquerque (the City) was barred by the two-year Tort Claims Act statute of limitations. NMSA 1978, § 41-4-15(A) (1977). Health Plus appealed against the City; Harrell responded to Health Plus’ appeal. Because Harrell’s answer brief advocates the City’s position, we evaluate this response as the City’s.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barber's Super Markets, Inc. v. StrykerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- Texas National Theatres, Inc. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BrooksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Amica Mutual Insurance v. MaloneyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Parker v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Valdez v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Southwest Steel Coil, Inc. v. Redwood Fire & Casualty InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Salas v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hunt v. North Carolina Logistics, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.