Bernard's Fur Shop, Inc. v. De Witt
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellant corporation was sued for possession of certain business property. Through its president it filed an answer raising two defenses, one being that notice to quit on August 1 had not been served until July 2, and thereby appellant was not given the required thirty days’ notice. Trial by jury was demanded and trial was set for October 6. On that date counsel for appellant requested a continuance on the ground that appellant’s president, who expected to testify on its behalf, was ill and could not be present. He presented to the court a doctor’s certificate that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cornwell v. CornwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Harrah v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- Etty v. MiddletonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stansel v. American Security BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Thanos v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
- Lyons v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Daniels v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Feaster v. FeasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.