Legal Opinion

Daniels v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 1999No. 96-CF-998, 96-CF-1036PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants Daniels and Campbell were convicted of first-degree murder while armed. 1 Daniels was also convicted of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence 2 and possession of a prohibited weapon. 3 On appeal both appellants claim that the evidence was insufficient to support their murder convictions and thát the trial court erred in refusing to force the government to accept a stipulation of the testimony of the medical examiner. Daniels contends, in addition, that the court erred in admitting hearsay testimony into evidence and then denying his motion for a…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Curry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Chatmon v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Omar v. Rollerson & Rolita N. Burns v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API