Legal Opinion
Harrah v. Morgenthau
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 15, 1937No. 6761PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
Daniel Dunning, a District of Columbia attorney, filed his bill against Charles J. Harrah and others July 2, 1934 and his amended bill October, 1934. The object of the bill was to obtain an injunction restraining the Secretary of the Treasury and the Treasurer of the United States from disposing of a fund in the Treasury in trust for Harrah and, upon final hearing, to have a decree for the payment of a claim for money due for professional services rendered by Dunning to Harrah. There were several interventions, and the answers of the defendants were filed the latter part of 1934 and the early…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. L. Bucki & Son Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Rausch v. CozianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- McMahan v. NorickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
- House v. CardinalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Overstreet v. Citizens' Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sisto v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Onaka v. OnakaHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Ondrey E. Gaspar, a Minor by Frank S. Gaspar v. M. Rafik Kassm v. Dennis L. Smetzer, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Cornwell v. CornwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- J. E. Hanger, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.