Department of Revenue v. Wheeler
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY C. BREITHAUPT, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter, involving the 2000 tax year, is before the court on a stipulated record and cross-motions for summary judgment. As to the factual basis for an outcome, the parties each argue that the other has the burden of proof. The court does not need to decide that issue because Defendants (taxpayers) have met the burden of proof, assuming it was theirs.
II. FACTS
Taxpayers are and, at all times material for this case, were residents of the State of Washington. For most of his career, Barney Wheeler (Wheeler) was employed by Fort James Corporation…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Allen v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2003
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Romani v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1985
- Ballard v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Patton v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Department of Revenue v. WheelerOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Clackamas Cty. Asses. v. Vill. at Main St. Phase, Tc 4877 (or.tax 6-15-2010)Oregon Tax Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.