Polo v. Edelbrau Brewery, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Per Curiam.
Plaintiff’s cause of action is predicated on an alleged malicious interference by defendant with plaintiff’s bank account by means of a third party order containing a stay directed against the bank. If the action be considered as one for malicious prosecution of a legal proceeding plaintiff was obliged to prove malice. If it be for interference with the contract between plaintiff and his bank, plaintiff was bound to prove the existence of malice or gross negligence. Actual malice or ill will did not have to be established in order to justify a finding of malice or gross…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hauser v. BartowNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Reporters' Ass'n of America v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Miller v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mayflower Industries v. Thor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Prospero Associates v. Redactron Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Goodstein v. Chalfonte Hotel Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950