Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Hardy
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 27, 1950No. Civ. 2806PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
This is a derivative stockholders’ action which was settled for $100,000 on the eve of trial. Thereafter, I awarded plaintiffs’ attorneys $18,000 as compensation for their services and ordered that they be reimbursed for all their expenses. The case is now before the court on request of plaintiffs’ counsel for reargument, a request made in the belief that if I had not acted under some inadvertence I would have made a larger allowance. The argument does not lead me to revise my action. It has, however, served as a suggestion that I should state the bases for my award so…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marcus v. OtisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jules E. Angoff v. Bernard Goldfine, Harold Brown v. Bernard GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1959
- Fletcher v. A. J. Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Pergament v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Milstein v. WernerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Ingalls v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.