Legal Opinion

Marcus v. Otis

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 16, 1949No. Civ. 28-455PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

This stockholder’s derivative suit has had a long and involved history. On appeal by plaintiffs-intervenors from a judgment approving a proposed agreement of compromise, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial. It declared the amount to be paid inadequate because under both New York and Delaware law, on the evidence then before the court, the defendants were prima facie liable ■ for conversion of shares of stock owned by the beneficiary corporation. The measure of damages, it held, was’ the highest intermediate value o:f the stock from the time of its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Shaw v. DreyfusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  3. Upson v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  4. Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  5. Equity Corp. v. GrovesNew York Court of Appeals · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tevis v. BeigelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Enstar Group, Inc. v. GrassgreenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993
  3. Steinberg v. HardyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API